It seems there is a pervasive piece of propaganda circulating among liberal circles. Somehow people have gotten the idea that term limits for Supreme Court justices are not only possible, they are the best solution for the current kangaroo Court.
In contrast, expanding the court is somehow radical and impossible.
This is completely false on so many levels, and term limits could prove far more harmful than good but, that’s irrelevant because we would never get there.
Let me say this again: we would never get to term limits.
Why? Lifetime terms for SCOTUS justices are enshrined in the Constitution.
Well, say you, it doesn’t SAY “lifetime appointment” in those words, it says “holding offices during good behaviour.” Take one little guess as to who will ultimately decide what those words mean?
Just the one guess?
Oh yes, there you go, those very justices whose terms would be limited. Right.
In order to change the Constitution, it has to be amended, which requires the agreement of 2/3rds of Congress and ratification by 3/4ths of the states. So.
Expansion of the Court is not new. When the Court was established, there were six Justices. Since then, the size of SCOTUS has changed six times. All that is required is an act of Congress, and it actually makes sense to do.
Personally I believe that taking of lavish gifts, vacations and money is not “good behaviour,” but Republicans would never impeach the very people they’ve spent decades and billions putting into place. I also can’t help but wonder if it’s criminal as it sure looks like bribery to me.
But that is not something over which we have control. What we can do is advocate for the most reasonable solution–expansion–and make sure we elect enough Democrats to make it happen.
Because I can promise it will be the first act of a Republican Congress under a Republican president.
Have a good Friday and a nice weekend, if possible.